2008 Ford F-350 vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 Ford F-350 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,802 cc (10 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1001 kg more than 2008 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford F-350 | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-350 | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6802 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6260 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 81 L |
