2008 Ford F-350 vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Ford F-350 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 400 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2008 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-350 | 1992 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-350 | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2560 mm |