2008 Ford F-350 vs. 2000 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Ford F-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rover 75 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2008 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 75. (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-350 | 2000 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-350 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2750 mm |