2008 Ford F-350 vs. 2012 Volkswagen up
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen up is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford F-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford F-350 would be higher. At 6,802 cc (10 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford F-350 weights approximately 178 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen up.
Because 2008 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen up, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-350 | 2012 Volkswagen up | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | F-350 | up |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6802 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 75 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6260 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |