2008 Ford F-450 vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Ford F-450 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-450 (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2008 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 761 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford F-450 | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-450 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6400 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 881 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2360 mm |
