2008 Ford F-450 vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 2008 Ford F-450 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-450 (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121.
Because 2008 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 778 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-450 | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-450 | 121 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6400 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 881 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2460 mm |