2008 Ford F-450 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford F-450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford F-450 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (503 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2008 Ford F-450. (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford F-450.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford F-450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XF. (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-450 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-450 | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6400 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 881 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2909 mm |