2008 Ford F-450 vs. 2013 Mazda 6

To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford F-450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford F-450 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-450 (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 6.

Because 2008 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 655 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 6. (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Ford F-450 2013 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model F-450 6
Year Released 2008 2013
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6400 cc 2489 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 350 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 3000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 881 Nm 226 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 6670 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 2430 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 2030 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 4390 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 144 L 70 L