2008 Ford Focus vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Ford Focus is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. Both 2008 Ford Focus and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO are equipped with a 1,996 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2008 Ford Focus. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Focus | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Focus | FTO |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.8 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
