2008 Ford Fusion vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Ford Fusion is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Fusion (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Fusion weights approximately 211 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Fusion (204 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Fusion | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fusion | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1177 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2390 mm |