2008 Ford Fusion vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Ford Fusion is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Fusion (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 63 kg more than 2008 Ford Fusion.
Because 2008 Ford Fusion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Fusion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Fusion (278 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Fusion | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fusion | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2560 mm |