2008 Ford Fusion vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Fusion would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 599 kg more than 2008 Ford Fusion.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Fusion. (212 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Fusion | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Ford | Ferrari |
| Model | Fusion | California |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 212 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 78 L |
