2008 Ford Ikon vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2008 Ford Ikon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP) has 468 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ikon.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 532 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ikon. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ikon | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ikon | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 542 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 642 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Top Speed | 171 km/hour | 349 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 340 mm |