2008 Ford Ikon vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2008 Ford Ikon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ikon weights approximately 601 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Ikon | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Ikon | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 173 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1050 mm | 2320 mm |
