2008 Ford Ikon vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2008 Ford Ikon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ikon.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ikon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ikon. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Ikon | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Ikon | I-350 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3458 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1050 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 74 L |
