2008 Ford Ka vs. 1953 Rover P4
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Rover P4 weights approximately 599 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1953 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Rover P4 (187 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1953 Rover P4 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ka | P4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1486 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 52 L |