2008 Ford Ka vs. 1958 Land Rover 109
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 813 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Land Rover 109 (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1958 Land Rover 109 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1958 Land Rover 109 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Ka | 109 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2285 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2780 mm |