2008 Ford Ka vs. 1960 MG MGA
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG MGA would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 MG MGA is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 MG MGA weights approximately 13 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1960 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 MG MGA (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 MG MGA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1960 MG MGA | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Ka | MGA |
Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |