2008 Ford Ka vs. 1965 MG Midget
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG Midget. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG Midget would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ka weights approximately 152 kg more than 1965 MG Midget.
Because 1965 MG Midget is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG Midget. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG Midget. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG Midget.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1965 MG Midget | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Ka | Midget |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1372 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1232 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2032 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 7 L/100km |