2008 Ford Ka vs. 1976 Renault 12
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 12 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Renault 12 weights approximately 19 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 12. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1976 Renault 12 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | 12 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 56 L |