2008 Ford Ka vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 693 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ka | Sigma |
Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |