2008 Ford Ka vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 413 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1994 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 77 L |