2008 Ford Ka vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 400 weights approximately 233 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 400 (183 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ka | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2630 mm |