2008 Ford Ka vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo S70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo S70 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo S70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo S70 weights approximately 493 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo S70 (267 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo S70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ka | S70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 7.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 68 L |