2008 Ford Ka vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ka weights approximately 7 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 15 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |