2008 Ford Ka vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ka weights approximately 147 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Ka | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |