2008 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1063 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 87 L |