2008 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Volvo V70
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo V70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo V70 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V70 weights approximately 695 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V70 (330 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ka | 2004 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ka | V70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1582 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |