2008 Ford Ka vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Ka would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1028 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.

Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 640 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Ford Ka 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Ford Cadillac
Model Ka CTS-V
Year Released 2008 2012
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1296 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 556 HP
Torque 106 Nm 746 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 887 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 68 L