2008 Ford Maverick vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Ford Maverick is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Maverick (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Maverick weights approximately 410 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Maverick (265 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Maverick | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Maverick | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |