2008 Ford Mondeo vs. 1969 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 Ford Mondeo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mondeo (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1969 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1969 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 269 kg more than 1969 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mondeo (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mondeo | 1969 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Mondeo | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1564 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |