2008 Ford Mondeo vs. 1979 Volvo 265
To start off, 2008 Ford Mondeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,662 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mondeo (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 265. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 142 kg more than 1979 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 265 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Mondeo. (208 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mondeo | 1979 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mondeo | 265 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 208 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |