2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Hudson Hornet. (144 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 693 kg more than 2008 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mustang | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Ford | Hudson |
Model | Mustang | Hornet |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2990 mm |