2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Mustang | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Mustang | 600 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
