2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Mustang | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mustang | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
