2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mustang | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |