2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 AC Cobra. (267 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Cobra. (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mustang | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Ford | AC |
Model | Mustang | Cobra |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1560 mm |