2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Mustang | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
