2008 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75.
Because 2008 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75. 1998 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Mustang | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | 75 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
