2008 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2008 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mustang | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Nea |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |