2008 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Mustang | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Mustang | City |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |