2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1500 weights approximately 53 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Ranger | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Ranger | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2970 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |
