2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ranger weights approximately 107 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Ranger | Alpine |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2970 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |