2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 210 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |