2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | RX-4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2970 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2520 mm |