2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 183 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | CJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2970 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |