2008 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (275 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | MazdaSpeed6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |