2008 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse (163 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Because 2008 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Eclipse |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 220 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 67 L |