2008 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 175 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Matrix |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |