2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Taurus X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Taurus X weights approximately 207 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Taurus X | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Taurus X | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2290 mm |
